The Department of Education’s (Education) quality control processes for data it collects from public school districts on incidents of restraint and seclusion are largely ineffective or do not exist, according to GAO’s analysis of school year 2015-16 federal restraint and seclusion data, the most recent available. Specifically, Education’s data quality control processes were insufficient to detect problematic data in its Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC,) data Education uses in its efforts to enforce federal civil rights laws. For example, one rule Education used to check the quality of data submitted only applied to very large school districts, although GAO and Education’s own analyses found erroneous reporting in districts of all sizes. Education also had no rules that flagged outliers that might warrant further exploration, such as districts reporting relatively low or high rates of restraint or seclusion. GAO tested for these outliers and found patterns in some school districts of relatively low and high rates of restraint or seclusion. Absent more effective rules to improve data quality, determining the frequency and prevalence of restraint and seclusion will remain difficult. Further, Education will continue to lack information that could help it enforce various federal civil rights laws prohibiting discrimination.
Format: |
|
Topics: | |
Website: | Visit Publisher Website |
Publisher: | Government Accountability Office (GAO) |
Published: | April 1, 2020 |
License: | Public Domain |